The Lieflock Line, Wootton Rivers and Tangley Trees

Mary Wicks–

Name: Mary Wicks

Given names: Mary

Surname: Wicks

Facts and events
Families
Sources
Notes
Google Maps™

Events of close relatives
Birth	yes
Marriage	Robert Lovelock — View this family 7 January 1777 Easton Royal, Wiltshire, England Shared note: BVR record had wife's name as Mary Wicks
Birth of a son #1	John Lovelock about 1779
Christening of a son	John Lovelock 22 August 1779 Easton Royal, Wiltshire, England
Burial of a son	John Lovelock 25 November 1801 Easton Royal, Wiltshire, England
Death	yes
Burial	yes Shared note: Burial record is uncertain. There were three Mary Lovelucks in Easton Royal: Burial record is uncertain. There were three Mary Lovelucks in Easton Royal: Mary née Chivers Mary née Willmaut Mary née Wicks and the attribution of the only two burial records: 1783 Feb 9 Buried Mary Lovlock 1790 Sep 10 Mary Lovelock is uncertain.

Date differences

Family with Robert Lovelock - View this family

husband	Ancestors Compact tree Descendants Family book Fan chart Hourglass chart Interactive tree Pedigree Pedigree map Relationships Family with spouse Mary Wicks John Lovelock Robert Lovelock Birth: about 1735 29 Death:
herself	Ancestors Compact tree Descendants Family book Fan chart Hourglass chart Interactive tree Pedigree Pedigree map Relationships Family with spouse Robert Lovelock John Lovelock Mary Wicks Birth: Death:
	Marriage: 7 January 1777 — Easton Royal, Wiltshire, England
3 years son	Ancestors Compact tree Descendants Family book Fan chart Hourglass chart Interactive tree Pedigree Pedigree map Relationships John Lovelock Birth: about 1779 44 Burial: 25 November 1801 — Easton Royal, Wiltshire, England

Show all sources

Show all notes
Marriage View	BVR record had wife's name as Mary Wicks
Burial View	Burial record is uncertain. There were three Mary Lovelucks in Easton Royal: Mary née Chivers Mary née Willmaut Mary née Wicks and the attribution of the only two burial records: 1783 Feb 9 Buried Mary Lovlock 1790 Sep 10 Mary Lovelock is uncertain.