| Henry DickmanBirth: between January 1842 and March 1842 24 24 Death: June 1848 | Sarah DickmanBirth: between July 1843 and September 1843 25 25 — Pewsey, Wiltshire, England Death: 17 February 1908 — Bunyip South, Bunyip, Victoria, Australia | James DickmanBirth: about March 1845 27 27 — Pewsey, Wiltshire, England Death: 28 August 1928 — Richmond, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia | John Henry DickmanBirth: about July 1848 30 30 Death: between July 1848 and September 1848 — Pewsey, Wiltshire, England | Henrietta DickmanBirth: between October 1849 and December 1849 31 31 — Pewsey, Wiltshire, England Death: 19 May 1927 — Bunyip, Victoria, Australia | Frank DickmanBirth: between October 1851 and December 1851 33 33 Death: March 1852 — Pewsey, Wiltshire, England | Fanny DickmanBirth: between July 1853 and September 1853 35 35 — Pewsey, Wiltshire, England Death: 4 September 1856 — Victoria, Australia | |
|
John DickmanBirth: about 1818 Death: 21 March 1895 — Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia |
|
Ann Lovelock EyelsBirth: 27 December 1817 24 23 — Pewsey, Wiltshire, England Death: 18 August 1855 — At sea, en route to Australia |
|  |  | | James LovelockBirth: about 1793 26 Death: 11 February 1865 — Pewsey, Wiltshire, England |
| | | Hannah EylesBirth: about 1794 18 — Wilcot, Wiltshire, England Death: 20 June 1872 — Pewsey, Wiltshire, England |
|
|
| Marriage | 14 November 1840
James:
1840 Nov 14 John Dickman Father: William & Ann Lovelock Eyels Father: James. Witnesses Moris Lovelock and Louisa Stone
Could the bride be a daughter of James Lovelock & Hannah Eyles mar. Wilcot 6 Nov 1819? Perhaps the surnames Lovelock Eyles means that she was born out of wedlock? Moris (Maurice) was presumably James' son bap Apr 1820 who married Lousia Stone.
Robert:
An intriguing thought James. She could have been born abt 1819 and so married aged abt 21. I'd be prepared to go with that one - even though we don't have the baptism. We only checked a modern transcript for baptisms for the period 1568-1840 in Pewsey so would have missed the surname EYLES in an index. Worth re-checking the PR for the baptism. Any takers?
Graham:
Sounds plausible to me, too, although probably born in 1818 or even 1817- Hannah was already pregnant with Maurice when she married. Also, the Burial Register has Maurice aged 71 when he was buried on 2 Apr 1890, suggesting he might also have been illegitimate. We don't have Maurice's precise baptism date.
| | Last change | 24 February 2017 – 18:17:10
by: Graham Lovelock |
|
|