James LovelockAge: 5 months1822–1823
- Name
- James Lovelock
- Given names
- James
- Surname
- Lovelock
| Christening | 10 November 1822 Source: Ramsbury Parish Register Citation details: Baptisms 1678-1922 Text: James son of William (resident Ramsbury, labourer) and Mary Lovelock Quality of data: primary evidence |
| Death | yes |
| Burial | 10 April 1823 (Age 5 months) Source: Ramsbury Parish Register Text: John Lovelock, Ramsbury, aged 6 mths |
| Family with parents |
| father |
William Lovelock Birth: about 1791 34 Death: about 1834 |
| mother |
Mary Williams Birth: about 1787 — Uffington, Berkshire, England Death: |
|
Marriage: 23 December 1811 — Ramsbury, Wiltshire, England |
|
| elder sister |
Sophia Lovelock Birth: about 1811 20 24 — Chilton Foliat, Wiltshire, England Death: between July 1862 and September 1862 |
|
7 years elder brother |
Francis Lovelock Christening: 21 December 1817 26 30 — Ramsbury, Wiltshire, England Death: between January 1862 and March 1862 |
|
8 months elder brother |
James Lovelock Birth: about August 1818 27 31 — Ramsbury, Wiltshire, England Death: |
|
4 years himself |
James Lovelock Christening: 10 November 1822 31 35 — Ramsbury, Wiltshire, England Death: |
|
7 years younger brother |
Edwin Lovelock Birth: about 1829 38 42 Death: |
| Christening | Ramsbury Parish Register Citation details: Baptisms 1678-1922 Text: James son of William (resident Ramsbury, labourer) and Mary Lovelock Quality of data: primary evidence |
| Burial | Ramsbury Parish Register Text: John Lovelock, Ramsbury, aged 6 mths |
| Note | 22 Feb 2011 This gedcom file has been amended to remove I2705 (John Lovelock) who was previously included as a brother of James, effectively a twin brother as they were deduced to have both been born in 1822. Although the transcribed Baptism entries for Ramsbury on the main Lovelock website include the baptism of James, there is no record of a John being baptised at the same time, or in the same year. Conversely, the burial of a John in 1823 at the age of 6 months needs to be considered in the light of a lack of evidence that James survived. Thus it is concluded that either the Register contains an error, or that a mistake has been made in the transcription of the burial, and that James and John are in fact the same child. Batch #: C058211, Source Call #: 943576 Could be a son of William bp 1756 Alternatively, could be son of William bp 5 Jan 1783 and Mary Williams |