Kate Ruth LovelockAge: 5 years1857–1862
- Name
- Kate Ruth Lovelock
- Given names
- Kate Ruth
- Surname
- Lovelock
Birth | between January 1857 and March 1857 46 43 Note: Especially exchanges 24/28 Nov 2006 and on 7/3/07.
Source: GRO - FreeBMD Citation details: Birth in 1Q 1857 in Winchester RD, ref 2c 91. Text: Lovelock, Kate Ruth Quality of data: primary evidence |
Census | 1861 (Age 4 years) Citation details: agreed transcription added RL 25-Jun-07 Quality of data: primary evidence Source: 1861 British Census Citation details: transcription provided by Graham Lovelock, email message 13-Jul-06 Quality of data: primary evidence |
_PPEXCLUDE | |
Death | about October 1862 (Age 5 years) Source: Graham Lovelock Note: Especially exchange on 7/3/07.
Source: GRO - FreeBMD Citation details: Death in Winchester RD in 4Q 1862, ref 2c 53 Text: Lovelock, Ruth Kate Quality of data: primary evidence Note: See notes.
Shared note: RL 20/6/07:Graham 7/3/07: "Do we have the death detail for Kate? I don't recall it, so perhaps it wasn't on Free BMD when I was looking. The entry is in the Oct-Dec quarter of 1862, in the Winchester RD of course, ref 2c 53. The entry is under the name of Ruth Kate. This is certainly consistent with being unable to find any other mention after 1861 in any records for Kate P, Kate R, or Ruth K or Ruth Kate."
|
Burial | 19 October 1862 (Age 5 years) |
Family with parents |
father |
John Lovelock Birth: about 1811 32 23 Death: about December 1882 — Winchester RD, Winchester, Hampshire, England |
mother |
Sarah Franklin Birth: between 1814 and 1816 — Winchester, Hampshire, England Death: between January 1886 and March 1886 |
Marriage: 24 December 1843 — Chilcomb, Hampshire, England |
|
11 months elder brother |
John Thomas Lovelock Birth: between October 1844 and November 1844 33 30 — Winchester, Hampshire, England Death: about December 1873 — Whitchurch RD, Whitchurch, Hampshire, England |
3 years elder sister |
Mary E Lovelock Birth: between October 1847 and December 1847 36 33 — Winchester, Hampshire, England Death: |
3 years elder sister |
Eliza Lovelock Birth: between 1849 and 1850 38 35 — Winchester, Hampshire, England Death: between October 1938 and December 1938 |
5 years elder brother |
Frederick Lovelock Birth: between July 1853 and September 1853 42 39 — Winnall, Winchester, Hampshire, England Death: |
4 years herself |
Kate Ruth Lovelock Birth: between January 1857 and March 1857 46 43 — Winchester, Hampshire, England Death: about October 1862 — Winchester RD, Winchester, Hampshire, England |
Birth | GEDCOM file as uploaded to Lovelock website 5 March 2007; created by James Loveluck and exported from his [Legacy] database. |
Birth | Robin Lovelock & Graham Lovelock: email discussions July 2006/July 2007 Note: Especially exchanges 24/28 Nov 2006 and on 7/3/07.
|
Birth | GRO - FreeBMD Citation details: Birth in 1Q 1857 in Winchester RD, ref 2c 91. Text: Lovelock, Kate Ruth Quality of data: primary evidence |
Census | Robin Lovelock & Graham Lovelock: email discussions July 2006/July 2007 Citation details: agreed transcription added RL 25-Jun-07 Quality of data: primary evidence |
Census | 1861 British Census Citation details: transcription provided by Graham Lovelock, email message 13-Jul-06 Quality of data: primary evidence |
Death | Graham Lovelock |
Death | Robin Lovelock & Graham Lovelock: email discussions July 2006/July 2007 Note: Especially exchange on 7/3/07.
|
Death | GRO - FreeBMD Citation details: Death in Winchester RD in 4Q 1862, ref 2c 53 Text: Lovelock, Ruth Kate Quality of data: primary evidence Note: See notes.
|
Burial | 'Lovelocks in Hampshire' data on main Lovelock website |
Source | Robin Lovelock, updated gedcom 24-Aug-07 Publication: Updated gedcom file provided by Robin Lovelock 24 Aug 2007. Includes contributions from Graham Lovelock |
Source | Originating email discussion |
Source | GEDCOM file as uploaded to Lovelock website 5 March 2007; created by James Loveluck and exported from his [Legacy] database. |
Source | Robin Lovelock & Graham Lovelock: email discussions July 2006/July 2007 Note: Especially exchanges 24/28 Nov 2006 and on 7/3/07.
|
Birth | RL 20/6/07: Mary E and Eliza both appear in the 1851 entr y (aged 3 and 1); both also appear in 1861, along with younger sister Kate (aged 13, 11 and 4). |
Birth | Especially exchanges 24/28 Nov 2006 and on 7/3/07. |
Census | Winchester, St Peter Cheesehill 11 Cheesehill Street RG9 693 F43 P5 John Lovelock;Head;M;50;Bricklayer's Labourer;Hants, Winchester Sarah Lovelock;Wife;M;44;;Hants, Winchester John T Lovelock;Son;U;16;Porter;Hants, Winchester Mary E Lovelock;Daur;;13;Scholar;Hants, Winchester Eliza Lovelock;Daur;;11;Scholar;Hants, Winchester Frederick Lovelock;Son;7;Scholar;Hants, Winchester Kate P [sic] Lovelock;Daur;4;Scholar;Hants, Winchester |
Death | RL 20/6/07:Graham 7/3/07: "Do we have the death detail for Kate? I don't recall it, so perhaps it wasn't on Free BMD when I was looking. The entry is in the Oct-Dec quarter of 1862, in the Winchester RD of course, ref 2c 53. The entry is under the name of Ruth Kate. This is certainly consistent with being unable to find any other mention after 1861 in any records for Kate P, Kate R, or Ruth K or Ruth Kate." |
Death | Especially exchange on 7/3/07. |
Death | See notes. |
Shared note | RL 20/6/07: We previously had Kate as 'Kate P'; the image o f the 1861 entry for 11 Cheesehill St, whence presumably this comes, is quite clear in this respect. In particular, examining the Enumerator's style suggests that the key letter could not be an 'R'. Yet the only relevant birth entry Graham and I have found (from BMDIndex and FreeBMD) is 1Q 1857 Lovelock, Kate Ruth Winchester RD 2c 91. Graham 7/3/07 (previously discussed RL/GL 24/28 Nov 2006, when I'd come across the entry in looking for GRO data to support the Compton tree): "Free BMD is almost complete in the years of interest and there's only the birth of [a] Kate Ruth [L], so I think [this must be our girl]. [Given the 1861 entry] it should be Kate Ruth in the tree and Kate P [sic] in the census record. Do we have the death detail for Kate? I don't recall it, so perhaps it wasn't on Free BMD when I was looking. The entry is in the Oct-Dec quarter of 1862, in the Winchester RD of course, ref 2c 53. The entry is under the name of Ruth Kate. This is certainly consistent with being unable to find any other mention after 1861 in any records for Kate P, Kate R, or Ruth K or Ruth Kate." |
Source | Especially exchanges 24/28 Nov 2006 and on 7/3/07. |