Hampshire - Suffolk - Rutland - Herefordshire Tree

RL 20/6/07: Mary E and Eliza both appear in the 1851 entry (aged 3 and 1); both also appear in 1861, along with younger sister Kate (aged 13, 11 and 4). As regards a possible GRO birth entry (for Mary E), I can find only 2Q 1845 Lovelock Mary, Winchester, ref 7 237. If this is Mary E, why would her age be consistently inaccurate in the census extracts we have? (Although we do have Eliza - still with her parents John and Sarah - entered as aged 28 in 1881.) In any case, we have this 2Q 1845 entry satisfactorily allocated to Mary daur of William L and Sarah (Perren) in the Compton tree.

(I also captured 3Q 1851 Lovelock Maria, Winchester, ref 7 271, but this is almost certainly Maria Louisa bap 17 Sep 1851 at St Cross and buried next day, 18 Sep 1851, at St Cross (3Q 1851 Winchester, ref 7 189), the illegitimate daughter of Jane L bap 22 Mar 1829 at St Cross and herself buried 15 Jun 1854 at St Cross (2Q 1854 Winchester, ref 2c 64), again in the Compton tree.)

RL 20/6/07: Mary E and Eliza both appear in the 1851 entry (aged 3 and 1); both also appear in 1861, along with younger sister Kate (aged 13, 11 and 4). Eliza was still with her parents John and Sarah in 1881, entered as aged 28.

RL 20/6/07: Mary E and Eliza both appear in the 1851 entr y (aged 3 and 1); both also appear in 1861, along with younger sister Kate (aged 13, 11 and 4).

RL 20/6/07: Graham and I had an exchange 1/4 Feb 2007 concerning the marriage and family of Walter L b 1867/8 Stockbridge (John T and Susan's second child). In the course of this I identified additional birth details for Walter and his 3 known siblings [we previously only had GRO entries (which I confirmed) for George J and William Edward; i.e. no GRO refs for Walter or Kate]. See notes to Walter's birth for further info.