RL 21/6/07:
(i) 'Fragment 6' has a note (presumably ref'ce the marriag
e) that "Charles jumped ship".
(ii) The following appeared among notes to the previous HTML version of this tree:
"Data from the NZ BMDs which could be related to the family of Charles LOVELOCK (b 1881/82) and Elizabeth Cathleen [sic] WALKER:
This death could be that of son Frederick b. 1907, but there's no age to confirm this:
1985 LOVELOCK Frederick Charles 8744 Death Dunedin
This birth could be another child of Charles and Elizabeth Cathleen:
1904 LOVELOCK Charles William 1146 Birth Dunedin March"
26/6/07: James, in response to my raising various queries/changes concerning Catherine/Cathleen and family, cited an earlier email he'd sent to Nigel, Graham and Robert "a few months after Nigel had proposed the connection between the (then embryonic) Hants-to-Hereford tree and the Wesmill tree" [I assume, therefore, c. Jan 2006]; the two BMDs above were mentioned in the message as not having been entered in the data "since they're somewhat uncertain".
